<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Water Quality &#187; Gary Michael</title>
	<atom:link href="http://water--quality.com/tag/gary-michael/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://water--quality.com</link>
	<description>Let's talk about water quality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Is Murphy&#8217;s Law purely satirical, or stating the obvious, that usually no QC whatsoever is occurring?</title>
		<link>http://water--quality.com/water-quality-management/is-murphys-law-purely-satirical-or-stating-the-obvious-that-usually-no-qc-whatsoever-is-occurring/</link>
		<comments>http://water--quality.com/water-quality-management/is-murphys-law-purely-satirical-or-stating-the-obvious-that-usually-no-qc-whatsoever-is-occurring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Water Quality Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Water Quality Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Michael]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Improvements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Answer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://water--quality.com/water-quality-management/is-murphys-law-purely-satirical-or-stating-the-obvious-that-usually-no-qc-whatsoever-is-occurring/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[paladin asked: Murphy&#8217;s Law &#8211; &#8220;whatever can go wrong, will go wrong&#8221; &#8211; or similar statements. Is Murphy’s Law simply a restatement that usually no quality control whatsoever is taking place and therefore if fortuitously quality occurs, it is allowed to fall back to a low water mark. Only exception would be if someone knew something about process control, as in the following “Usually in process control a percentage limit is the benchmark. So if the limit was set at 98.5% and output quality dropped below that then the alarm bells would start ringing. It would be Quality Management&#8217;s job to get the process back on track and continuously work on improvements to raise the bar higher than 98.5%. “(as stated in a Yahoo Answer) vanilla, To curmudgeon, vol larry michael Thanks for terrific answers vanilla, To curmudgeon, vol gary michael Thanks for terrific answers To: vanilla, curmudgeon, vol gary...</p><p><strong><a href="http://water--quality.com/water-quality-management/is-murphys-law-purely-satirical-or-stating-the-obvious-that-usually-no-qc-whatsoever-is-occurring/">Read Full Article</a></strong></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/cc/water_quality_management12.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/cc/water_quality_management12.jpg" title='water quality management' alt='water quality management' /></a></div>
<div><em><strong>paladin</strong> asked: </em><br/><br/><br/>Murphy&#8217;s Law &#8211; &#8220;whatever can go wrong, will go wrong&#8221; &#8211; or similar statements.</p>
<p><span id="more-350"></span></p>
<p>Is Murphy’s Law simply a restatement that usually no quality control whatsoever is taking place and therefore if fortuitously quality occurs, it is allowed to fall back to a low water mark.</p>
<p>Only exception would be if someone knew something about process control, as in the following “Usually in process control a percentage limit is the benchmark. So if the limit was set at 98.5% and output quality dropped below that then the alarm bells would start ringing. It would be Quality Management&#8217;s job to get the process back on track and continuously work on improvements to raise the bar higher than 98.5%. “(as stated in a Yahoo Answer)<br />
vanilla,<br />
To curmudgeon,<br />
vol<br />
larry<br />
michael<br />
Thanks for terrific answers<br />
vanilla,<br />
To curmudgeon,<br />
vol<br />
gary<br />
michael<br />
Thanks for terrific answers<br />
To:<br />
vanilla,<br />
curmudgeon,<br />
vol<br />
gary<br />
michael<br />
Thanks for terrific answers<br/><br/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://water--quality.com/water-quality-management/is-murphys-law-purely-satirical-or-stating-the-obvious-that-usually-no-qc-whatsoever-is-occurring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

