<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there some sort of scale that ranks wetland quality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://water--quality.com/water-quality-standards/is-there-some-sort-of-scale-that-ranks-wetland-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://water--quality.com/water-quality-standards/is-there-some-sort-of-scale-that-ranks-wetland-quality/</link>
	<description>Let's talk about water quality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Alyssa</title>
		<link>http://water--quality.com/water-quality-standards/is-there-some-sort-of-scale-that-ranks-wetland-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyssa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://water--quality.com/water-quality-standards/is-there-some-sort-of-scale-that-ranks-wetland-quality/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Wetland classification isn&#039;t a very controversial area of study, expect when you attempt what you&#039;re doing, which is looking at the function of the wetland. So I guess the answer is, there IS no standard.

Basically, there are over a hundred different methods of wetland quality assessment; pretty much every organization has their own. I would seriously suggest the source, even though it&#039;s a pdf.  If the scientific jargon isn&#039;t working for you, drop me a lone and I can summarize.  

It would be fun to talk about as I&#039;m actually discussing Water Quality Assessment in my Environmental Management Course :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wetland classification isn&#8217;t a very controversial area of study, expect when you attempt what you&#8217;re doing, which is looking at the function of the wetland. So I guess the answer is, there IS no standard.</p>
<p>Basically, there are over a hundred different methods of wetland quality assessment; pretty much every organization has their own. I would seriously suggest the source, even though it&#8217;s a pdf.  If the scientific jargon isn&#8217;t working for you, drop me a lone and I can summarize.  </p>
<p>It would be fun to talk about as I&#8217;m actually discussing Water Quality Assessment in my Environmental Management Course <img src='http://water--quality.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oikos</title>
		<link>http://water--quality.com/water-quality-standards/is-there-some-sort-of-scale-that-ranks-wetland-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>oikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://water--quality.com/water-quality-standards/is-there-some-sort-of-scale-that-ranks-wetland-quality/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Sort of. In terms of the protection they get, you can range from &quot;ordinary wetlands&quot; (Go ahead and fill in half an acre; we don&#039;t mind.) to &quot;exceptional value wetlands&quot;. The latter category is for wetlands that feed a drinking water supply, are home to a population of an endangered or threatened species, etc.

Your idea of ranking on the basis of diversity indices is a good one. With streams, we rank on the basis of numerous indices, not only those that measure diversity. The indices are then compared to those for a stream in the same general area that is considered to be in good shape. Prior to that, I had been using my own standards, a stream that was affected by a malfunctioning sewage treatment plant and one that not only had stoneflies, it was dominated by them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sort of. In terms of the protection they get, you can range from &#8220;ordinary wetlands&#8221; (Go ahead and fill in half an acre; we don&#8217;t mind.) to &#8220;exceptional value wetlands&#8221;. The latter category is for wetlands that feed a drinking water supply, are home to a population of an endangered or threatened species, etc.</p>
<p>Your idea of ranking on the basis of diversity indices is a good one. With streams, we rank on the basis of numerous indices, not only those that measure diversity. The indices are then compared to those for a stream in the same general area that is considered to be in good shape. Prior to that, I had been using my own standards, a stream that was affected by a malfunctioning sewage treatment plant and one that not only had stoneflies, it was dominated by them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

